classic | mobile
 

Search...

SA Instrumentation & Control Buyers' Guide

 

The expanding scope of automation events and alerts
August 2017, System Integration & Control Systems Design


Detecting, reporting, and responding to abnormal situations or events are all important functional elements of a complete process automation strategy. Traditional control systems present this information in the form of alarms directed to the operations staff on the control system console. In abnormal situations, the volume of these alarms can present a significant challenge as operators are subjected to alarms, floods or storms.

Process-related alarms are only one type of alert typically presented to the operations staff. For example, the growing importance of industrial control systems (ICS) cybersecurity means that security-related events must also be captured and managed. The ISA/IEC 62443 series of standards on industrial automation and control systems security explicitly state that security-related events and alerts must be collected and maintained for analysis. The standards implicitly assume that once this information is collected, someone will be available to interpret it and take the appropriate action.

Automation solution providers and end-users must focus not only on the nature of the information, but how to express it and, most importantly, to whom. More research and development is required in this area. End-users must state clear requirements and expectations as to the types of information they require when describing anomalous behaviour in their processes.

Abnormal situations

Detecting and responding to abnormal situations has been a topic of considerable interest in industrial automation for many years. Early work in this area included that of the Abnormal Situation Management (ASM) Consortium, which began with Honeywell’s Alarm Management Task Force to address alarm floods. More recently international standards bodies have addressed the topic; most notably the ISA18 committee on instrument signals and alarms.

Alarm management

Alarm management has been an important element of industry response. The ISA18 committee was created to “…establish terminology and practices for alarm systems, including the definition, design, installation, operation, maintenance and modification and work processes recommended to effectively maintain an alarm system over time.”

The original standard from this committee, ISA-18.1-1979 (R2004), Annunciator Sequences and Specifications, is intended primarily for use with electrical annunciators that call attention to abnormal process conditions using individual illuminated visual displays and audible devices. In 2009, the committee completed ANSI/ISA-18.2, Management of Alarm Systems in the Process Industries. Additional technical reports have also been developed on several aspects of alarm management, including:

• ISA-TR18.2.3-2015, Basic Alarm Design.

• SA-TR18.2.4-2012, Enhanced and Advanced Alarm Methods.

• ISA-TR18.2.5-2012, Alarm System Monitoring, Assessment, Auditing.

• ISA-TR18.2.6-2012, Alarm Systems for Batch and Discrete Processes.

Additional sources of alerts

However, an abnormal situation may be signalled by more than just traditional process-related alarms. The increased use of monitoring systems and other ‘smart’ devices results in a wide variety of alerts that may require a timely response. These additional sources include:

• Cybersecurity – It is becoming more common to have some sort of network or security monitoring in place, with alerts generated for events such as unusual network traffic, authorisation failures, or unauthorised network traffic.

• Network monitoring – With the increased sophistication of process networks it may be necessary to detect and alert on unusual situations such as node or switch failures.

• Physical security – Monitoring devices such as cameras or physical access sensors may also have the capability to generate alerts or requests for attention.

• Business process alerts – Various information or workflow automation solutions may also be capable of alerting staff to unusual behaviour.

The result is that a growing amount of information may be generated with an expectation of further follow-up for analysis and resolution. Unfortunately, it is not always clear exactly who is accountable for this follow-up and associated response. In the absence of an explicit definition, certain assumptions may be made.

For example, it is safe to assume that the operations staff (operators, plant engineers, etc.) will always be available to react to abnormal situations. Operators and plant engineers generally understand the implications and potential consequences of such events, including possible impacts on the integrity of the system under control. However, they may not have the skills or experience to make the best decisions in response to these new sources of information.

Unfortunately, it is much easier to configure devices and systems to generate alerts than to fully define the intended audience and expected actions associated with them. In the case of process alarm management, this has resulted in automation systems that have far too many alarms for which the optimum response is not clear. Adding new sources of alerts such as security and network management will only exacerbate this situation.

For more information contact Paul Miller, ARC Advisory Group, +1 781 471 1141, pmiller@arcweb.com, www.arcweb.com


Share via email     Share via LinkedIn   Print this page

Further reading:

  • Batch size one production
    February 2018, Siemens Digital Factory & Process Indust. & Drives, System Integration & Control Systems Design
    Bürkle based in Freudenstadt specialises in the field of press lines and coating technology, supplying turnkey production plants to its customers. To comply with the requirements of one customer requesting ...
  • Technical support encourages custom applications
    February 2018, Countapulse Controls, System Integration & Control Systems Design
    Countapulse Controls has survived by instituting technological innovation in the face of socio-economic uncertainty. In its more than 60 years in business, this leading supplier of sensing solutions has ...
  • Customer centricity and a sterling team pave the way for CSS
    January 2018, Control Software Solutions, System Integration & Control Systems Design
    A customer-centric approach has allowed Control Software Solutions (CSS) to attain a high percentage of repeat business from its growing client base. This Level 2 BBBEE company has a solid 15 years of ...
  • New improved plant information management system
    January 2018, Yokogawa South Africa, System Integration & Control Systems Design
    Yokogawa has released the ExaquantumTM R3.10. This latest version of the Exaquantum plant information management system comes with stronger security and improved compatibility through the support of OPC ...
  • Hybrid Automation supplies control for fertiliser plant in Zimbabwe
    December 2017, Hybrid Automation, System Integration & Control Systems Design
    Grow Agriculture is a significant industry player, manufacturing and distributing fertilisers and chemicals in Zimbabwe. Its client base includes the largest sugar estates, tobacco merchants, brewers ...
  • Recovery of nutrients from wastewater
    December 2017, Siemens Digital Factory & Process Indust. & Drives, System Integration & Control Systems Design
    Ostara Nutrient Recovery Technologies (Ostara) based in Vancouver, Canada, has become a leader in the recovery of nutrients. The company uses a special technique to remove pollutants from wastewater and ...
  • CSI’s customer-centric focus ­underpins its quality market ­offering
    November 2017, Control Systems Integration, System Integration & Control Systems Design
    A high level of business ethics, coupled with quality of workmanship, exemplary skill levels and experience of staff members, together with its dedicated focus on delivering added-value industrial solutions, ...
  • Safe and reliable steel production
    November 2017, Endress+Hauser, System Integration & Control Systems Design
    Endress+Hauser’s dedicated measurement and software for steel production.
  • Future-proof assembly concept for high-end shavers
    November 2017, Omron Electronics, System Integration & Control Systems Design
    Philips chooses Omron technology for reliable production of shaving devices.
  • PC-based control for process automation
    November 2017, Beckhoff Automation, System Integration & Control Systems Design
    HART functionality integrated in TwinCAT software and I/O system.
  • The future is digital
    October 2017, Siemens Digital Factory & Process Indust. & Drives, System Integration & Control Systems Design
    Secure new competitive advantages through greater flexibility, quality and energy efficiency.
  • Integrated automation system ­optimises wire binding
    October 2017, Beckhoff Automation, System Integration & Control Systems Design
    PC-based control and drive technology for fully automated paper and print processing.

 
 
         
Contact:
Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd
1st Floor, Stabilitas House
265 Kent Ave, Randburg, 2194
South Africa
Publications by Technews
Dataweek Electronics & Communications Technology
Electronic Buyers Guide (EBG)

Hi-Tech Security Solutions
Hi-Tech Security Business Directory

Motion Control in Southern Africa
Motion Control Buyers’ Guide (MCBG)

South African Instrumentation & Control
South African Instrumentation & Control Buyers’ Guide (IBG)
Other
Terms & conditions of use, including privacy policy
PAIA Manual





 

         
    classic | mobile

Copyright © Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd. All rights reserved.