Training & Education


Michael Brown’s practical control courses

June 2014 Training & Education

Michael Brown is holding another series of his well-known courses on practical process control. The courses are unique and invaluable to novices, as well as to experienced practitioners in the field of regulatory control optimisation. They offer a new and practical approach to a clear understanding of the complexities of feedback control.

The series consists of two courses:

* Introduction and appreciation of practical process control: one day for non-instrument personnel who work in process plants, but have no previous experience or practical training in control, such as: process engineers; production managers; metallurgists and chemical engineers. It is also recommended that people who are attending the Parts 1 & 2 the following week should attend the introductory.

* Practical Process Control Parts 1 & 2: five days for instrument and control personnel, like senior mechanicians, technicians and engineers. Even people with years of experience in this field have found the course an eye-opener. Subjects covered include: loop problems and troubleshooting; tuning and control of processes with difficult dynamics and techniques like feed-forward.

The first course series will take place in Johannesburg on Friday 25 July at a cost of R2721 and the second will run from Monday 28 July to Friday 1 August at a cost of R15 582 (prices are for early payment three weeks prior to the course and excl. VAT). Booking should be made early as the courses are normally oversubscribed. (Only 12 delegates are accepted.)

For more information contact Michael Brown Control Engineering, 082 440 7790, michael.brown@mweb.co.za, www.controlloop.co.za



Credit(s)



Share this article:
Share via emailShare via LinkedInPrint this page

Further reading:

Case History 195: Unstable reboiler steam flow
Michael Brown Control Engineering Editor's Choice
A high-pressure steam flow control in a reboiler on a column in a petrochemical refinery continually cycled when placed in automatic. Several attempts had been made to tune the controller, but these had been unsuccessful.

Read more...
Loop signature 25: Tuning part 3 - Results of tuning a particular simple self-regulating process by several different methods.
Michael Brown Control Engineering Editor's Choice
A couple of SWAG methods of tuning were given in the previous Loop Signature article. I have tuned a simple self-regulating process using those methods, and two other tuning methods, one of them being the sophisticated Protuner tuning package, which is the system I employ. The tests were performed on a very accurate and powerful simulation package, and the results are compared below.

Read more...
Case history 194: Boiler level control problem.
Michael Brown Control Engineering Editor's Choice Fieldbus & Industrial Networking
A boiler level control in a petrochemical refinery was causing problems, as the level was cycling badly and taking a long time to recover from sudden load changes. In addition, there were frequent high-level alarms.

Read more...
Case History 193: The big dipper.
Michael Brown Control Engineering Editor's Choice
This article gives an example of an important flow control system for flare gas in a petrochemical refinery. The control was suffering from serious problems, often cycling severely, and at other times the flow process variable (PV) would suddenly move quite a lot away from the setpoint (SP).

Read more...
Loop signature 23: Tuning part 1.
Michael Brown Control Engineering Editor's Choice
This is the first of several articles dealing with the subject of tuning. I have found that many people think that optimisation consists solely of tuning. I would stress once again that tuning is the last thing one should do when optimising regulatory controls.

Read more...
Loop signature 22: How cyclical disturbances affect a control loop
Michael Brown Control Engineering Editor's Choice
When tuning noisy loops, we recommend in our courses that one should eliminate the noise by editing it out, so the tuning will be done only on the true process response, free of any noise. The controller is controlling the process, and is not controlling the noise.

Read more...
Case History 191: The weakest link.
Michael Brown Control Engineering Valves, Actuators & Pump Control
Which is the weakest link in a control loop? The answer, without any doubt is that, in most cases, the final control element is the weakest link.

Read more...
Mecosa training courses
Mecosa Training & Education
Courses designed for Radiation Protection Officers    This seminar is designed to equip the participants with an understanding of radioactive sources, their application, safe use and what to do in the ...

Read more...
Reminiscences of a life in control
Michael Brown Control Engineering SAIMC
Reminiscences from Michael Brown on a long and rich journey in the world of automation together with SAIMC.

Read more...
Loop signatures 21: You cannot control if your measurement is incorrect.
Michael Brown Control Engineering Editor's Choice
The first law of process control could be stated as saying that you cannot control if your measurement is incorrect. We all know this law. However do we all remember it in the heat of the moment?

Read more...