Training & Education


Michael Brown's practical process control training courses 2007

February 2007 Training & Education

Courses in Johannesburg Training Centre:

* Introductory Course - 13 April, 20 July, 16 November

* Part 1 Course - 16 to 18 April, 23 to 25 July, 19 to 21 November.

* Part 2 Course - 19 to 20 April, 26 to 27 July, 22 to 23 November.

Note: It is highly recommended that both Parts 1 and 2 courses be taken in one session.

Courses held in client's plant:

Subject to arrangement with client.

Fees 2007 (prices excluding VAT)

Courses in Johannesburg Training Centre (price per person):

Introductory Course (1 day): R1698,00

Part 1 Course (3 days): R5508,00

Part 2 Course * (2 days): R3966,00

Both Parts 1 and 2 in one 5-day session: R8717,00

Courses held in client's plant in South Africa:

In-plant Introductory Course: R10 450,00 (1 day, price per group of 10)

In-plant Field Equipment Course (Measurements & Valves): R10 450,00 (1 day, price per group of 10)

In-Plant Course: Part 1 (Troubleshooting & Loop Tuning): R36 300,00 (5 days, price per group of 6)

In-Plant Course: Part 2 (Control Techniques for More Difficult Processes)*: R16 236,00 (2 days, price per group of 6)

* The Part 2 Course can only be taken if the delegate has completed Part 1.

For all bookings phone Michael Brown at +27 (0)11 486 0567, 082 440 7790, or fax +27 (0)11 646 2385, or e-mail [email protected]



Credit(s)



Share this article:
Share via emailShare via LinkedInPrint this page

Further reading:

Case History 198: Cascade control overcomes valve problems
Michael Brown Control Engineering Fieldbus & Industrial Networking
A large petrochemical refinery asked me to perform an audit on several critical base layer control loops. This article deals with a problem found on a valve controlling the flow of fuel to a heat exchanger.

Read more...
Loop signature 28: Things to consider when tuning.
Michael Brown Control Engineering Editor's Choice Fieldbus & Industrial Networking
I was giving a course at a remote mine in the middle of the Namibian desert. We were discussing tuning responses, and as I always do on my courses, I mentioned that in my opinion ¼ amplitude damped tuning is not desirable, and is in fact not good.

Read more...
Case History 197: Bad reboiler temperature control.
Michael Brown Control Engineering Editor's Choice Flow Measurement & Control
It is very important that reboiler temperature controls operate well in petrochemical refineries, or the product quality can really suffer. I was asked to check such a control in a refinery where they were having problems with one of these controls.

Read more...
Case History 196: Unstable condensate level control.
Michael Brown Control Engineering Editor's Choice Level Measurement & Control
The operators in a petrochemical refinery were having great trouble in trying to stabilise the condensate level in a vessel, and this was adversely affecting other loops downstream. Several unsuccessful attempts had been made to retune the controller.

Read more...
Loop signature: Tuning part 4 processes
Michael Brown Control Engineering Editor's Choice Fieldbus & Industrial Networking
The purpose of this particular article is to try and give those unfortunate enough to have to use SWAG (scientific wild ass guess) tuning a bit of an idea of how to go about it, and even more importantly some understanding of a couple of basic principles.

Read more...
Case History 195: Unstable reboiler steam flow
Michael Brown Control Engineering Editor's Choice
A high-pressure steam flow control in a reboiler on a column in a petrochemical refinery continually cycled when placed in automatic. Several attempts had been made to tune the controller, but these had been unsuccessful.

Read more...
Loop signature 25: Tuning part 3 - Results of tuning a particular simple self-regulating process by several different methods.
Michael Brown Control Engineering Editor's Choice
A couple of SWAG methods of tuning were given in the previous Loop Signature article. I have tuned a simple self-regulating process using those methods, and two other tuning methods, one of them being the sophisticated Protuner tuning package, which is the system I employ. The tests were performed on a very accurate and powerful simulation package, and the results are compared below.

Read more...
Case history 194: Boiler level control problem.
Michael Brown Control Engineering Editor's Choice Fieldbus & Industrial Networking
A boiler level control in a petrochemical refinery was causing problems, as the level was cycling badly and taking a long time to recover from sudden load changes. In addition, there were frequent high-level alarms.

Read more...
Case History 193: The big dipper.
Michael Brown Control Engineering Editor's Choice
This article gives an example of an important flow control system for flare gas in a petrochemical refinery. The control was suffering from serious problems, often cycling severely, and at other times the flow process variable (PV) would suddenly move quite a lot away from the setpoint (SP).

Read more...
Loop signature 23: Tuning part 1.
Michael Brown Control Engineering Editor's Choice
This is the first of several articles dealing with the subject of tuning. I have found that many people think that optimisation consists solely of tuning. I would stress once again that tuning is the last thing one should do when optimising regulatory controls.

Read more...