System Integration & Control Systems Design


Case History 144: Report after optimisation exercise – part 5

October 2015 System Integration & Control Systems Design

This is the fifth article taken from a report which was prepared for various departments in a process company after some optimisation work was performed for them. (The other four articles were published in preceding months.) Serious problems encountered another two important loops are described in this article.

The first one is the control of the outlet temperature of a steam desuperheater on a boiler. Control of steam temperature is extremely important for refinery processes, such as in distillation columns, and it is vital that this loop performs well. The temperature is controlled on a desuperheater by controlling the flow of spray water into the steam.

Bad strategy makes accurate desuperheater control impossible

Figure 1 illustrates the recommended basic control configuration for a direct heating steam desuperheater. As can be seen the outlet temperature of the steam is controlled using a simple temperature to flow control cascade system. The purpose of the flow secondary control is to ensure that the correct mass of water is injected into the desuperheater. The flow loop responds very much faster than the temperature loop and thus it effectively eliminates all problems such as valve faults and water pressure variations that would seriously affect the temperature control.

Figure 1.
Figure 1.

In the actual loop in the plant we are talking about here, although there was a water flow measurement, no flow secondary cascade had been configured, and the output of the temperature controller was connected directly to the water control valve. There were major problems causing temperature swings and the operators normally tried to control the temperature in manual.

Due to the fact that the water flow was measured, it was possible to test the valve operation by varying the output of the temp­erature controller and seeing the affect on the flow. An open loop test is shown in Figure 2, and this illustrates exactly why the temperature was not being controlled properly. It can be seen that that when opening the valve from the closed position, there is no flow until the controller output gets to about 10% and then the flow jumps straight up from zero to about 18%. This is creating problems and cycling at low loads. Once again even if they can improve this, I would strongly recommend that a cascade flow loop be created which will help tremendously.

Figure 2.
Figure 2.

Apart from this, it was also found that the original tuning was completely unstable, and caused continuous cycling – another wonderful example of a badly tuned temperature control loop. It is really interesting to compare the 'as-found' and final tuning values:

As-found tuning: P = 17, I = 1,5 repeats/ minute.

Final tuning: P = 1,1, I = 1.0 repeats/ minute.

Sticky valve destroys differential pressure control loop

The second example is of a differential pressure control the purpose of which is to keep a constant flow of product through the one side of a heat exchanger. Again, it is also an important control as variance in it can have all sorts of effects on other interactive loops.

Figure 3 shows part of a closed loop test where the setpoint is being held constant. It can be seen that the controller is battling to keep the PV on setpoint, and is ramping up and down in a type of saw-tooth wave, whilst the PV seems stuck at times and then jumps to a new value on either side of setpoint. This typical of stick-slip cycle, where the valve sticks, and the integral action in the controller starts ramping as it attempts to get the PV moving. Eventually, the actuator builds-up sufficient to overcome the valve stiction and the valve starts moving. However, there is now so much energy in the actuator that the valve overshoots. Then the cycle reverses.

Figure 3.
Figure 3.

This problem can only be corrected by fixing the valve.

Brown is a specialist in control loop optimisation with many years of experience in process control instrumentation. His main activities are consulting, and teaching practical control loop analysis and optimisation. He gives training courses which can be held in clients’ plants, where students can have the added benefit of practising on live loops. His work takes him to plants all over South Africa and also to other countries. He can be contacted at Michael Brown Control Engineering cc, +27(0)82 440 7790, michael.brown@mweb.co.za, www.controlloop.co.za



Credit(s)



Share this article:
Share via emailShare via LinkedInPrint this page

Further reading:

WLS15 Pro series strip light
July 2021, Turck Banner , System Integration & Control Systems Design
Turck Banner’s new WLS15 Pro comes in Pro Editor, IO-Link, or Pick-IQ compatible models.

Read more...
Water resource sustainability management
July 2021, Yokogawa South Africa , System Integration & Control Systems Design
One way Yokogawa is successfully pursuing its sustainability goals is through its service to the global water industry.

Read more...
Case History 178: An over-filtered hydrogen flow loop
July 2021, Michael Brown Control Engineering , Editor's Choice
A good example that shows how lack of knowledge of the practicalities of control can result in terrible control characteristics.

Read more...
Loop Signatures 1: Introduction to the Loop Problem Signatures series
May 2020, Michael Brown Control Engineering , Editor's Choice
Over the years I have had many requests to write a book giving more detailed explanations of some of the problems I have encountered in my work on practical loop optimisation. I am by nature and inclination ...

Read more...
SCiBOTRON’s quality culture the key to success
May 2020 , System Integration & Control Systems Design
The company was founded on lean principles and quickly grew into a QSE (Qualifying Small Enterprise). Ricardo Paddy, managing director and founding member, attributes one of the reasons for the company’s ...

Read more...
Visualisation using vision-specific controls
June 2021, Beckhoff Automation , System Integration & Control Systems Design
TwinCAT Vision combined with TwinCAT HMI.

Read more...
Modularity boosts performance
June 2021, SEW-Eurodrive , System Integration & Control Systems Design
Integrated technologies automate, upgrade and streamline existing production processes, while still allowing for future technology to be incorporated.

Read more...
Changing negative attitudes towards alarms
June 2021, Omniflex Remote Monitoring Specialists , System Integration & Control Systems Design
Why technology is only as good as the people using it.

Read more...
Loop Signatures 7: Final control elements – Part 3 hysteresis and deadband
June 2021, Michael Brown Control Engineering , Editor's Choice
Some of the biggest problems associated with the final control element are hysteresis and backlash.

Read more...
Smart traffic management for Syntell
April 2021 , System Integration & Control Systems Design
Syntell is a leading South African technology company. One of its key projects is the running and management of one third of Johannesburg’s traffic lights. Syntell’s system is a full traffic management ...

Read more...