System Integration & Control Systems Design


Systems Automation and Management: Upgrade old Siemens S5 control systems to the latest Siemens PCS7

September 2012 System Integration & Control Systems Design

Systems Automation and Management (SAM) has developed methodologies, using various products and engineering knowhow, to give its clients a control system upgrade without breaking the budget. Thus all the functionality of a new control system can be achieved without replacing all the legacy hardware and software. The implemented technologies set the foundation for future expansion and modification.

The issues today when upgrading a control system on an existing plant are as follows:

* Budgets have been squeezed to do the work and major upgrades can severely affect the cash flow of the company.

* A phased approach to upgrading the plant is required, while still setting a technology foundation for future upgrade phases.

* No company can afford to shut down their plant for any length of time, so upgrades usually have to be done slowly during planned outages.

* There is always a risk that an upgrade will result in production downtime.

* Product life cycles are becoming shorter. Clients are looking to extend their investments in the control systems in order to maximise their return on investment.

Phase 1 CPU upgrade

The first step is to replace the existing S5 CPU cards with the new dual control system X5/X7 CPUs. The X5/X7 CPU can execute both the Simatic Step 5 and Step 7/PCS7 programmes simultaneously. The CPU also has a four-port Ethernet switch on board. This allows one to run the existing S5 inputs and outputs as well as the existing Simatic S5 software on the new X5/X7 CPU and communicate with any scada system. By using the existing software, the changeover of the CPUs and connection to Ethernet can be achieved in a matter of hours.

During this phase, SAM will be able to connect previously non-networked control systems to other major PLC brands on an industrial network and communicate to any scada system. Further, the old HMI/Scada can usually be run in parallel with the new system. This allows time to check correct functionality of the new system and also gives plant personnel time to accept and adapt to the new technology.

Phase 2 hardware upgrade

The second step in the upgrade process is to replace the existing PLC I/O cards in expansion racks and remote I/O racks with new S7 remote I/O racks. At this stage, the client can elect to introduce technologies such as field buses, remote I/O in the field, new intelligent instrumentation, as well as intelligent energy meters.

By introducing these new technologies, a vast amount of additional information can be extracted, stored in the historian and used for data analysis and production optimisation.

The upgrade process can be stopped at this stage and run with a combination of new PLC hardware and old PLC software. SAM has secured the agency of several companies who specialise in repairing and supplying old PLC modules, thus eliminating any problem with legacy spares.

Phase 3 software development

The third phase of the upgrade process involves developing the new control system software. In parallel to the systematic change-over of the old S5 hardware to S7 hardware, the new PCS7 software can be developed and tested.

At this stage PCS7 specific ‘Controls/Software Standards’ can be developed that will include functionality such as intelligent alarm management, plant sequencing, work flows, intelligent maintenance systems etc. Furthermore, links to the ERP system can be established for data exchange. During maintenance shutdowns, the old software can be disabled, and the new software enabled and commissioned.

If the engineers encounter problems with the new software while testing on the plant, they can always reinstate the old software and get the plant up and running, without any risk of production loss. The fact that this feature is available means that the engineers are not under excessive stress to get the new software running, which allows them to concentrate on developing quality software.

During this phase all new software can be checked without affecting the plant, thus the new software can use the feedback from the actual plant for true plant simulation.

Phase 4 replication

Once the new PCS7 software for one plant section has been proven to the satisfaction of the client, the next plant section can be upgraded using the same procedures as above.

Conclusion

This methodology minimises the client’s risks both in terms of production downtime and cash flow and the processes allow them to proceed cautiously with the upgrade and manage the phases in accordingly.

The latest control and automation technologies can be deployed rapidly and the client can take advantage of these technologies to maximise ROI at a fraction of a complete control system upgrade. Depending on the client’s particular plant and respective needs, the above four phases can be extended to incorporate several combinations and intermediate steps in to the upgrade plan.

The issues related to controls system upgrades as initially stated can be addressed and their impacts minimised by utilising the experience gained and methodology developed by SAM over several years.



Credit(s)



Share this article:
Share via emailShare via LinkedInPrint this page

Further reading:

Four ways the global parts shortage has led to innovation and openness
System Integration & Control Systems Design
For those who use automation parts, the unpredictable nature of the supply chain is one of the biggest problems faced today. The shortfall has impacted every industry, but automation components have been especially affected.

Read more...
Iritron’s year of consolidation
Iritron Editor's Choice System Integration & Control Systems Design
Despite the multiple challenges faced by businesses in South Africa, the buoyancy of the technology sector worldwide has produced some green shoots for automation specialist, Iritron.

Read more...
Five edge opportunities for SIs to maximise revenue in 2024
Editor's Choice System Integration & Control Systems Design
System integrators continue to face the challenge of doing more with less – supporting complex operations, while meeting production schedules with limited resources, and innovating to increase efficiency, maximise safety and reduce risk.

Read more...
Condition monitoring in a forging press retrofit
Beckhoff Automation System Integration & Control Systems Design
Significantly increased vibration on machines can result in many forms of negative impacts such as reduced system performance or damage to the machine and foundation. Using the example of retrofitting a forging press with a maximum press force of 2000 tons, Wölfel Engineering explains how efficiently the process was tailored and implemented with PC-based control and measurement technology from Beckhoff.

Read more...
System integration in the digital age
System Integration & Control Systems Design
To meet the challenges of an increasingly competitive marketplace, many manufacturers (end users) must focus on their core competencies and outsource the rest to experts.

Read more...
Choosing a system integrator
Editor's Choice System Integration & Control Systems Design
Automation is an essential part of manufacturing today. Whatever the size, an upgrade or migration project can be complex, and the risks can be high. This is where system integrators (SIs) can help. They can bring together complex subsystems or components of a larger system and make them operate as a whole.

Read more...
Iritron awarded international contract for furnace control
Iritron System Integration & Control Systems Design
Iritron has been awarded two international, multimillion-Rand furnace drying projects. The company has extensive expertise in furnace drying control systems, and provides solutions in the fields of electrical, instrumentation, control systems, and decision support systems.

Read more...
Capitalise on risks by turning them into opportunities for growth
Iritron System Integration & Control Systems Design
In spite of the challenges facing the global and local economy, systems integration expert, Iritron remains optimistic for the year ahead, and believes that there are significant opportunities to be found during a challenging economic climate.

Read more...
Control loop case history 185: Temperature cascade control on boiler desuperheaters.
Michael Brown Control Engineering Editor's Choice System Integration & Control Systems Design
This is a wonderful example of how the use of a cascade flow control still allowed excellent control of the primary temperature control loop to be achieved, in spite of a valve with severe problems.

Read more...
Loop Signatures 15: Digital controllers – Part 7: The D term, concluded
System Integration & Control Systems Design
This third and final article on the subject of the derivative term in digital controllers deals with choosing the right response if you wish the derivative action to work on both setpoint changes and load changes.

Read more...