System Integration & Control Systems Design

Smart production line configuration

October 2021 System Integration & Control Systems Design

In today’s fast-paced environment, manufacturers are under increasing pressure to deliver on time while still being flexible enough to handle unexpected changes. They need to operate within shorter lead times and satisfy greater and increasing customer demands. To achieve this, they require the capability to schedule production smarter and more dynamically, while hoping for as little downtime as possible. In addition, they need the ability to monitor what is happening on the production floor in real-time to enable real-time decisions.

Although ‘better scheduling’ might sound like a simple answer, the reality is that this exercise of knowing which order to place on what line and in which sequence is mostly performed by singular individuals in the company who, mostly under pressure, base their scheduling on experience and gut feel. Should that person be on leave or off sick, then … well, fingers crossed that it does not happen.

Optimising discrete manufacturing

In the discrete manufacturing environment, a tool change or the reconfiguration of a production line is a major cause of production loss. Planners continuously try to compensate for this, however, in most cases, it is not the only constraint they need to consider. Although changing tools or the configuration of a production line is a necessary exercise, it can easily take hours, if not days, to ensure that the machine or line is ready to run the next order. Unfortunately, time spent on tool change or line configuration is not something that can be eliminated. However, it is possible to optimise and reduce the time it takes. Many companies use a combination of SMED (single minute exchange of dies) principles in combination with a scheduling solution to achieve this optimisation. Modern scheduling tools go a long way to assist production personnel achieve less downtime, more throughput and happier customers.

A practical example

Let us look at the example of manufacturing items of different colours on the same line or machine. A large part of the tool change exercise is to ensure that the equipment is clean and fit for use for the next product. If you are manufacturing a black item and the next order requires a light one, then a full machine cleaning, possibly combined with a complete die change-out will be required, or otherwise, many items may have to be discarded, as the black colour will take significant time to work itself out of the machine. If, however, another order lower down in the queue is for dark blue items, it may be a viable option to move this order up in the queue as it will require less cleaning as the black pigment will only shade the blue a little darker for the first number of units produced.

Other examples include the bottling of soft drinks, where orders for lighter colour drinks can be scheduled first followed by gradually darker shade colours, which reduces the time spent on CIP (cleaning in progress) and utility usage. When cutting large coils of material, the number of knives that need to be changed between orders can be drastically reduced if orders of similar or gradually changing sizes are scheduled together. Where production lines for fast-moving, short-cycle orders consist of mostly manual labour, it may be possible to schedule products requiring the same number of people on the same line, reducing under-or-over resourcing of production lines.

The above sounds simple and logical, however most companies have multiple lines and machines operating simultaneously, processing a large amount of frequently changing orders and priorities continuously. In this scenario, the alternative and possible sequences can quickly become overwhelming, if not impossible, for one person to comprehend, correlate and re-schedule – no matter how smart the Excel spreadsheet is.

Scheduling algorithms

Modern scheduling software tools have been specifically developed to meet this need for small, medium and large enterprises. By using advanced algorithms that balance demand and capacity to generate achievable production schedules, modern scheduling software provides an interactive, multi-constraint scheduling system. The availability of human resources, equipment capacity, tooling and materials availability, as well as product variables such as colour, thickness and line configuration, for instance, are all considered in scheduling rules. Orders can be scheduled quickly by using intelligent built-in business rules and the planner can also manually interact with the schedule to make changes based on their experience, changing priorities, or unexpected supply constraints.

By defining specific schedule optimisation rules, the planner will be able to dynamically calculate the preferred or optimal sequence to minimise changeover or line configuration times. Such scheduling systems can be customised and configured as needed and can be used as a standalone system or integrated with enterprise and production software, such as MES and ERP systems.

Companies that implemented dedicated production scheduling software realised benefits such as:

• The optimisation of production operations.

• Significant reduction of non-value-added activities such as setup and tooling time.

• Reduction of late deliveries due to manufacturing delays.

• Lower production costs due to less costly downtime.

Although production scheduling can be a frightening task, modern purpose-built scheduling software will ensure that you get a good night’s rest – even if the planner decides to sleep in!

For more information contact Gerhard Greeff, Iritron, +27 82 654 0290,,


Share this article:
Share via emailShare via LinkedInPrint this page

Further reading:

Loop Signatures 12: Digital controllers – Part 4: The I term
Michael Brown Control Engineering Editor's Choice System Integration & Control Systems Design
Generally, as PLCs sometimes do not handle PIDs well, I always do some tests on them to check on the operation of their control loops.

Risk assessments accelerate Booyco PDS adoption
Editor's Choice System Integration & Control Systems Design
As mines systematically assess the risks related to their trackless mining machinery, they increasingly see the value in proximity detection systems.

Control loop: Case History 182 - A temperature cascade control loop that didn’t work
Michael Brown Control Engineering Editor's Choice System Integration & Control Systems Design
The problems encountered in a heater outlet temperature control in a petrochemical refinery were causing considerable difficulties for the operators. Here is another wonderful example of the power of cascade control, even with a really bad control element.

The role of ‘green’ packaging in sustainable manufacturing
Omron Electronics System Integration & Control Systems Design
Sustainability in the packaging industry is one of the key aspects in fighting the plastic waste issue and, ultimately, climate change.

Working hand in hand to meet automotive OEMs’ strict requirements
Turck Banner Sensors & Transducers System Integration & Control Systems Design
The LASE Group, producer of machines and assembly cells for the automotive industry, places trust in its close collaboration with Turck Multiprox.

PC-based control for seed treatment
Beckhoff Automation System Integration & Control Systems Design
The cost and consumption reports generated by the production control system open up new ways of managing and analysing data.

Cobot boosts production by 15%
Omron Electronics System Integration & Control Systems Design
Topcustom, an Italian producer of custom-made bathroom sinks, has recently transformed part of its operations by deploying a collaborative robot (cobot) from Omron. The new cobot is being used to automate ...

Integrated control and software solutions for operational efficiency and traceability
Schneider Electric South Africa System Integration & Control Systems Design
Actionable insight from integrated operations has the potential to transform business and improve risk management.

Omron and FlexLink design collaborative palletiser
Omron Electronics System Integration & Control Systems Design
The cobot solution, with its small footprint and active safety equipment, enables the handling of up to 8 boxes per minute without the need for fencing or laser scanners.

Control loop: Case History 181 - Understand the basics of the components in the loop
Michael Brown Control Engineering Editor's Choice System Integration & Control Systems Design
To my amazement I find that people seem to think that because these days we are using ‘smart’ transmitters, the basic rules can be ignored.