Editor's Choice


Case history 189: Poor furnace temperature control.

September 2023 Editor's Choice PLCs, DCSs & Controllers

Many process engineers do not appreciate the importance of flow loops in their unit controls.

A senior process engineer once told me that flow loops need not be tuned well, as they generally have little effect on the more important and much slower loops like temperatures and pressures. In actual fact, flow loops can be vitally important for ensuring that other controls work properly. The example given here is an excellent illustration of this.

The process unit used for this example is the steam desuperheater on a boiler in a petrochemical refinery. The water is heated using gas as the fuel. The final desuperheater outlet temperature is a cascade secondary loop, with the primary control being the outlet temperature control of the upstream desuperheater. Just out of interest, there was a measurement of the outlet steam flow after the second desuperheater, but they had not used this as a further cascade to ensure the temperature control worked properly, which is something I recommended they do. A secondary flow cascade loop takes care of any valve problems as it can quickly ensure that the flow of steam keeps to the amount demanded by the temperature controller. In actual fact, there were several problems with the steam desuperheater valve.

The problem being experienced on the steam temperature was that it was cycling quite badly, and they had not been able to establish the cause. Investigations were carried out as to what was causing the cycle, by checking all the various controls that could have had an effect on the desuperheaters’ outlet temperatures. It was found quite quickly that the culprit causing the problem was the combustion air flow control loop.

Figure 1 is a Closed Loop as Found test on the airflow, with the controller in automatic, and using the original tuning parameters. A series of setpoint changes was made, as can be seen in the figure. The flow was apparently in a continuous slow cycle, with a 20% amplitude and a period of roughly 100 seconds. The other two traces shown in the figure are the outlet temperatures of the two desuperheaters in cascade. It can be clearly seen what a large influence the cycle of the air flow was having on them, particularly on the secondary cascade desuperheater.

Figure 2 shows an Open Loop test performed on the air flow where steps are made on the PD (controller’s output). This shows some remarkable things, which explain why the control was cycling in automatic:

• The moment the PD dropped below 41%, the flow immediately dropped by about 20%, and one could not control the flow once the PD had gone below that value.

• When the PD was moved up in small 3% steps from 41%, the flow responded pretty well. However when we stepped the PD down again, the flow did not move at all until the PD went below 41%. Then it immediately dropped by the 20% as mentioned above.

• When repeating the test it was found on a couple occasions that the flow did occasionally slowly move a little on downward steps of the PD in the upper region.

These observations show that there were very serious problems with the air damper, and proved that no real control was possible until it could be fixed or replaced. It also conclusively showed why the cycle occurred in automatic, with the controller trying to get the flow to a value in the region over which the valve just jumped up and down. This is a good example of how poor control on a flow can seriously influence other more important and slower controls.



Michael Brown is a specialist in control loop optimisation, with many years of experience in process control instrumentation. His main activities are consulting and teaching practical control loop analysis and optimisation. He now presents courses and performs optimisation over the internet. His work has taken him to plants all over South Africa and also to other countries. He can be contacted at: Michael Brown Control Engineering CC, +27 82 440 7790, [email protected], www.controlloop.co.za


Credit(s)



Share this article:
Share via emailShare via LinkedInPrint this page

Further reading:

Loop signature 22: How cyclical disturbances affect a control loop
Michael Brown Control Engineering Editor's Choice
When tuning noisy loops, we recommend in our courses that one should eliminate the noise by editing it out, so the tuning will be done only on the true process response, free of any noise. The controller is controlling the process, and is not controlling the noise.

Read more...
High-performance motion control for teabag packaging machine
Beckhoff Automation Editor's Choice
Teepak relies on PC-based control and drive technology from Beckhoff to set new benchmarks for speed and precision in its teabag packaging machines.

Read more...
VEGA takes the pressure out of water pressure measurement
VEGA Controls SA Editor's Choice
Water treatment systems in metropolitan areas require careful monitoring and management processes across widespread networks. However, process plants choosing VEGA for their process automation know that the company offers more than just precise and reliable pressure sensors and instrumentation.

Read more...
Advantages of wireless storage tank and container tank level monitoring
Turck Banner Southern Africa Editor's Choice
Implementing a tank monitoring system that utilises ultrasonic or radar sensors in a wireless network has many advantages.

Read more...
Case History 191: The weakest link.
Michael Brown Control Engineering Valves, Actuators & Pump Control
Which is the weakest link in a control loop? The answer, without any doubt is that, in most cases, the final control element is the weakest link.

Read more...
Bringing Industry 4.0 to a castings foundry for heavy industries
Editor's Choice
Moving to Industry 4.0 takes time and determination, especially for an established company in a heavy industry. Castings foundry, POK in Mexico has moved toward Industry 4.0 in a series of steps over several years, changing from manual to automated systems for more available, immediate and reliable data.

Read more...
SMOM – the future is here now
Iritron Editor's Choice IT in Manufacturing
In his presentation at the recent MESA Africa conference, Neels van der Walt, business development manager at Iritron, revealed the all-encompassing concept of smart mining operations management (SMOM), and why it is inextricably linked to the future of worldwide mining operations.

Read more...
Navigating disruption in manufacturing
Editor's Choice IT in Manufacturing
When considering IT in manufacturing, the underlying assumption is twofold: first, a wave of valuable maturing technologies can be harnessed to create new business value, and second, the environment in which these technologies will be applied will be relatively predictable, with change following a manageable, evolutionary path. However, recent disruptions have shattered these assumptions.

Read more...
The fascination of movement
Editor's Choice Motion Control & Drives
A motor from Faulhaber provides gentle motion for the finest watches in the world.

Read more...
Complete system for transparent energy monitoring
Beckhoff Automation Editor's Choice Electrical Power & Protection
Transparent energy monitoring reduces both machine downtime and the necessity to oversize the corresponding components. Added to these advantages are simplified preventive maintenance, and increased production efficiency. The wide range of PC-based control technology from Beckhoff offers a solution that can be optimally adapted to individual applications.

Read more...