Editor's Choice


Case History 187 - Integrating or self-regulating or both?

May 2023 Editor's Choice

It is vital, when optimising a control loop, to establish at the outset if the process is self-regulating or integrating, as not only do these two process types behave completely differently ,but also they are tuned very differently. A typical self-regulating process is a flow where if you make a step-change to the input to the process, the output moves to a new value and then remains constant at that value. An integrating process on the other hand is one where if the input to, and the output from, the process are different, then the output is always either ramping up or down. It is only constant when the output is equal to the input. It is known as a balancing process. A very good example of an integrating process is the control of a level in a vessel.

Unfortunately, it is sometimes very difficult to decide if a process is actually self-regulating or integrating. For example, certain processes, like certain temperature and pressure control of compressible fluids like gases and steam, sometimes seem to exhibit both characteristics. A good example of this is level control of a liquid in a tank that has not got a pump on the output of the tank. We call this a gravity feed tank. The output flow is dependent on the force of gravity acting on the height of the liquid in the tank. Now, if at a certain point in time the input and output flows are equal, the level remains constant. If one now makes a small step increase in the output flow, the level immediately starts ramping down, but as the level decreases, the head of liquid in the tank is getting smaller and hence the output flow starts decreasing as well. If you have not made too big a step, the level will actually eventually balance itself out. The resultant total curve recorded in the level now looks exactly like a self-regulating process. However, level is definitely integrating. So how do we define it?

Basically what has effectively occurred is that the process started reacting as an integrator and then changed into a self-regulator. There are quite a few cases where this happens, and there are also some odd cases where a process starts as self-regulating and turns into an integrator. The important rule for tuning is that in these cases you always tune on the initial reaction.

It is sometimes quite difficult to decide if a process is better tuned as an integrator or as a self-regulator, and it sometimes takes quite a long time, especially on very slow processes like some temperature control processes. We teach how best to deal with these cases in our courses.

Generally, level is always integrating, but there are occasional cases where the tests make it look self-regulating. An example of this is the gravity feed tank level described above. However, I recently came across an unusual case of level control where the test initially appeared to be giving a truly self-regulating response. This was in the control of levels of cooling towers on a mineral processing plant.

Figure 1 is a recording of an As Found Closed Loop test on one of the towers, where a setpoint (SP) step change is made on the controller, which is in automatic, with the original tuning parameters set in it. The level was in a small continuous slow cycle. It can be seen that the response after the SP was stepped was also rather slow and very cyclic. This type of action is very typical of cycling on integrating processes and is usually caused by either bad tuning (commonly as the result of too fast an Integral (I) setting, or by hysteresis in the valve, and with P+I action in the controller.

Figure 2 shows the Open Loop test we performed. We first got the process into balance with the PD (controller output) at a value where the level PV remained constant. With the controller in manual, a step change was made on the PD. It can be seen that the level started ramping down, but after a while the ramp rate started decreasing and eventually the PV became constant. This would certainly appear to be a self-regulating process, however level is nearly always definitely integrating.

So why did this become self-regulating? We could not initially see any reason for this behaviour, as the level was not gravity fed. However, the process was configured in rather an unusual manner. The liquid feeding the cooling tower was pumped into the tower via the control valve. Then there was also a pump on the output of the vessel which one would think would keep the flow out of the tank pretty constant. This, on the face of it, definitely appears to be a true integrating process.

The only explanation for the behaviour of the actual response that we could think of would be that the output pump’s characteristics were affected by the head of liquid in the tower. Unfortunately in the time available it was not possible to get details of the pump’s characteristics, but it seems to be the only logical explanation.

In any event we did try tuning it both as a self-regulator and then as an integrator. The tuning as an integrator worked much better. Figure 3 shows the window we used for the integrator tuning.

Figure 4 shows a section of the final Closed Loop test with the new tuning. The response was still a little cyclic but the PV settled out after one cycle and stuck to SP at normal conditions without cycling. It was working much better.

The new tuning had much the same P gain as the old, but the integral time was double.

This was an interesting example of the difficulties one can encounter when trying to identify if a process is integrating or self-regulating.

Michael Brown is a specialist in control loop optimisation, with many years of experience in process control instrumentation. His main activities are consulting, and teaching practical control loop analysis and optimisation. He now presents courses and performs optimisation over the internet. His work has taken him to plants all over South Africa, and also to other countries.


About Michael Brown


Michael Brown.

Michael Brown is a specialist in control loop optimisation, with many years of experience in process control instrumentation. His main activities are consulting and teaching practical control loop analysis and optimisation. He now presents courses and performs optimisation over the internet.

His work has taken him to plants all over South Africa and also to other countries. He can be contacted at: Michael Brown Control Engineering CC, +27 82 440 7790


Credit(s)



Share this article:
Share via emailShare via LinkedInPrint this page

Further reading:

A South African legacy in telemetry
Editor's Choice Industrial Wireless
Telemetry is becoming a vital component of industrial strategy, allowing companies to harness real-time data to optimise processes and reduce waste. One company leading this technological shift is Interlynx.

Read more...
Case History 199: Another example of the effectiveness of cascade control
Michael Brown Control Engineering Editor's Choice Fieldbus & Industrial Networking
In my last article I wrote about how cascade control systems can effectively overcome valve problems. This article gives another example of how a temperature control was able to perform well, in spite of really severe valve problems.

Read more...
Upgrading legacy automation
Omron Electronics Editor's Choice Fieldbus & Industrial Networking
Legacy automation is characterised by technology in the later stages of its useful life. As new automation technologies continue to emerge and interconnect at an exponential rate, failing to integrate these technologies can widen the gap between the competitive and the obsolete.

Read more...
Planetary gear units for high torque requirements
SEW-EURODRIVE Editor's Choice Motion Control & Drives
Packing a compact design, along with high torque and low-speed outputs, the new SEW PPK and SEW P2.e planetary gear units from SEW-EURODRIVE offer new capabilities in continuous heavy-duty applications where space is at a premium.

Read more...
These robots crawl into every nook and cranny
DNH Tradeserve t/a DNH Technologies Editor's Choice Motion Control & Drives
Inuktun's small crawler robot magnetically sticks to metal walls and is able to move in all directions. It carries cameras, sensors and tools for inspection or maintenance work in tight pipes and on the outer hulls of tanks or ships. All crawler modules and cameras are equipped with brushed DC motors from Swiss drive specialist, maxon using various motor-gearhead combinations.

Read more...
Swiss watchmaking meets hypercar power
Horne Technologies Editor's Choice
The display of Bugatti’s upcoming luxury model, Tourbillon will be something truly special. Instead of a digital version, the driver will see a genuine Swiss timepiece behind the steering wheel.

Read more...
Reinventing the wheel
Editor's Choice
Once a curiosity in the early automotive age, in-wheel motors are now re-emerging with real promise. From electric cars to commercial vehicles and even aircraft, they are on the verge of transforming transportation engineering.

Read more...
Creating new magnets for electric motors
Editor's Choice
Innomotics, a global specialist in electric motors and large drive systems, is coordinating a consortium for a research project on ‘Integrated Product and Process Innovation for Electric Drives’.

Read more...
Sustainability is transforming fluid power
Editor's Choice Motion Control & Drives
Sustainability is reshaping the future of fluid power. With the growing demand for cleaner, more efficient technologies and tightening global regulations, fluid power systems are being re-engineered for higher efficiency, lower emissions and reduced material usage.

Read more...
The power of water
Editor's Choice Electrical Power & Protection
The Alpenglow Hy4 is the world’s first water-based hydrogen combustion engine, offering a convincing alternative to traditional battery-electric vehicles and established hydrogen fuel cell designs.

Read more...









While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein, the publisher and its agents cannot be held responsible for any errors contained, or any loss incurred as a result. Articles published do not necessarily reflect the views of the publishers. The editor reserves the right to alter or cut copy. Articles submitted are deemed to have been cleared for publication. Advertisements and company contact details are published as provided by the advertiser. Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd cannot be held responsible for the accuracy or veracity of supplied material.




© Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd | All Rights Reserved