Fieldbus & Industrial Networking


Shared fast Ethernet: understanding PDVs and collision domains

May 2006 Fieldbus & Industrial Networking

Why are the configuration rules for 100 Mb Ethernet different from 10 Mb?

With Ethernet's carrier sense multiple access with collision detection (CSMA/CD) protocol, LAN devices listen for collisions as they send out packets. If another device transmits before the first device finishes sending, both back off and try again later. For this scheme to work properly, the propagation delay for a packet to travel across the Ethernet segment must be less than the time required to clock the shortest legal packet (64 bytes) onto the LAN. Otherwise, simultaneous senders will not hear each other before they have complete sending.

As the clock speed of the signal increases from 10 Mb to 100 Mb, the time to put a packet onto the LAN decreases. The propagation delay (or packet travel time), however, is determined by the length of the LAN cable... including any repeater delays... and does not change with the data rate. Therefore, the maximum allowable distance between end stations on a LAN decreases as the speed increases.

Limits for 100 Mb Ethernet

At a clock speed of 100 Mb/s, it takes 5,12 microseconds to put the shortest legal packet (64 bytes, or 512 bits including headers, etc) onto the LAN. Therefore, the maximum propagation delay is the same amount of time, 5,12 microseconds or 512 Bit Times. The limit for any shared Ethernet installation is a configuration of cables and repeaters and NICs over which a broadcast packet must travel that does not exceed the maximum propagation delay time. It is convenient to measure the propagation delay in bit times (BT). The Fast Ethernet standard is based on this form of measurement.

A collision domain is a cluster of network devices connected together (without bridging) wherein a broadcast Ethernet packet travels to all of the nodes. To be compliant with Fast Ethernet specifications, a collision domain must be less than 512 BT. That is to say, the signal propagation time for the path between any two nodes must be no more than 512 BT. In any real installation, the most significant collision domain path is the longest path in terms of propagation delay since that is the path that is the limiting factor for that installation.

What 'propagation delay time' means in practical terms

There is a fixed amount of propagation delay time, 512 BT, that can be used up by the network devices in any path between end points of a collision domain. Each network element in a path uses up some amount of the available time budget for that path. When the total time delay for a path reaches the 512 BT maximum, that path becomes a limiting factor on the network topology since nothing more can be added into that path without violating shared Fast Ethernet specifications.

All network elements introduce some delay into the signal's path within a collision domain. Each network interface controller (NIC) introduces a delay from where a packet originates, each metre of cable length introduces a delay due to the distance the packet must travel along its way, and each electronic device such as a repeater introduces a delay due to slowing down the packet as it makes its way through the electronics. The delay values are a major characteristic of each network element, and each network element must be measured and rated in terms of its path delay value (PDV).

PDVs for some typical network elements

NICs are electronic in nature and have PDVs in the same range as other electronic elements. NICs (also called DTEs) that meet the Fast Ethernet specification have a PDV of 50 BT or less. Since there must be two NICs in practically any path through any collision domain... one NIC at each end point... then 100 BT of the total PDV budget of 512 BT is used up by the NICs. This leaves 412 BT for everything else.

Cables introduce delay that is proportional to their length. Fibre cable is fastest, with a PDV of 1,0 BT per metre. A fibre cable segment that connects two fibre NICs, with no repeater in the path, can be a maximum of 412 metres in length.

Category 5 twisted pair cable introduces slightly more delay than fibre cable since the signal is in the form of electricity travelling over copper rather than light waves travelling through glass. Specifically, CAT 5 cable has a PDV of 1,11 BT per metre. This is 11% more than fibre. (CAT 3 cable has a PDV of 1,14 BT per metre, insignificantly more than CAT 5). Of course, twisted pair cable attenuates the signal as it travels along, and it is limited to 100 metres in length per segment accordingly. A repeater will rejuvenate the signal and boost its strength, enabling a packet to travel another 100 metres over another twisted pair cable segment in the collision domain. Each 100 metres of CAT 5 twisted pair cable has a PDV of 111 BT.

There are typically two twisted pair cables of up to 100 metres each in length in a collision domain path, used to connect the two devices at the end points of the collision domain. These two cable segments use up 222 BT of the PDV budget. So, we are down to 190 BT (512 minus 100 minus 222 = 190) left in the path delay budget for the repeaters and the cables interconnecting the repeaters.

PDVs for Fast Ethernet repeaters

Since two Class II repeaters must be useable in a collision domain, and since only 190 BT of the delay budget is available for both of them, it can be seen that the PDV of a Class II repeater is 95 (ie, half of 190) BT. In fact, the Fast Ethernet specification for a Class II repeater is 92 to 95 BT. The specification for a slower repeater that only meets Class I is a PDV of up to 140 BT, and there can practically be only one of them in a 100 Mb/s collision domain. Most Class I and Class II Fast Ethernet repeaters (or hubs, which are the same thing in this case) are designed to meet these specifications, and have very limited installation configurability accordingly.

A better hub design would have a PDV much less than 95 BT. Obviously, a hub with a lower PDV is better because it provides better network configurability. The time delay that is gained from lowering the PDV means that either there can be more total cable length in the longest collision domain path, or there can even be another hub in the path. The configuration limitation of only one (Class I) or two (Class II) hubs is severe, particularly when future growth and expansion of the network must be considered. Hubs with low PDVs that could be configured with three in the PDV budget of 190 BT, ie, with a PDV of about 60 BT, would permit multilevel cascading and vastly improved network installation limitations.

Woodbeam offers fast GarrettCom Magnum Ethernet hubs with PDVs in the range of 60 to 80 BT.





Share this article:
Share via emailShare via LinkedInPrint this page

Further reading:

Integrating fire alarm systems into building management systems
Beckhoff Automation Fieldbus & Industrial Networking
Fire alarm systems work independently of the building automation system. Schrack Seconet has developed a flexible gateway using ultra-compact industrial PCs and TwinCAT from Beckhoff, which can be used to flexibly convert a customer-specific communication protocol to a wide range of transmission standards.

Read more...
Premium unmanaged industrial switch
Vepac Electronics Fieldbus & Industrial Networking
Premium unmanaged industrial switch for long-distance, noise-free fibre connectivity

Read more...
Fire and gas suppression solutions for mission-critical industries
Fieldbus & Industrial Networking
By representing world-leading brands and focusing on fully integrated, certified systems, HMA South Africa is positioning itself as a trusted partner in fire detection, suppression and explosion-proof safety solutions across the continent.

Read more...
The future of manufacturing
Fieldbus & Industrial Networking
Industrial automation is evolving at an unprecedented pace. At the forefront of this transformation is the Siemens SIMATIC ET 200SP HA Distributed I/O system. This is a flexible and scalable distributed I/O system for modern signal transfer from the field to the control level.

Read more...
Time-sensitive networking
RJ Connect Editor's Choice Fieldbus & Industrial Networking
In this article, we will explore what is driving the rise of time-sensitive networking, how it is reshaping industrial efficiency, the challenges when deploying this technology, and ways to tackle these challenges.

Read more...
Loop Signature 30: Nonlinearity in control loops (Part 1)
Michael Brown Control Engineering Editor's Choice Fieldbus & Industrial Networking
If nonlinearity occurs it means that if one is to carry on controlling with the same response to changes in load or setpoint, then the tuning of the controller will also need to be adjusted to meet the new conditions.

Read more...
PC-based control regulates innovative dehumidifiers
Beckhoff Automation Fieldbus & Industrial Networking
Swedish company, Airwatergreen is breaking new ground in the dehumidification of air in industrial buildings and warehouses. The patented CVP technology reduces energy requirements and ensures an indoor climate that prevents corrosion and mould growth. PC-based control from Beckhoff regulates this innovative process.

Read more...
Ethernet connectivity for embedded systems
Fieldbus & Industrial Networking
Delivering Ethernet connectivity for embedded systems, XPort ETH Click is a compact add-on board from MIKROE, the embedded solutions company that dramatically cuts development time by providing innovative hardware and software products based on proven standards.

Read more...
Compact mini PC
Vepac Electronics Fieldbus & Industrial Networking
AS AAEON’s first Intel Core-powered PICO-SEMI system capable of fanless operation, the PICO-MTU4-SEMI from Vepac Electronics is easily deployed as part of larger equipment setups or integrated as the central unit of smart robotics solutions such as AGVs, AMRs and drones requiring minimal maintenance.

Read more...
Future-ready I/O to redefine connectivity
Schneider Electric South Africa Fieldbus & Industrial Networking
Schneider Electric South Africa has launched its state-of-the-art Modicon Edge I/O NTS. This future-ready I/O redefines connectivity, data aggregation and operational efficiency for industrial applications.

Read more...









While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein, the publisher and its agents cannot be held responsible for any errors contained, or any loss incurred as a result. Articles published do not necessarily reflect the views of the publishers. The editor reserves the right to alter or cut copy. Articles submitted are deemed to have been cleared for publication. Advertisements and company contact details are published as provided by the advertiser. Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd cannot be held responsible for the accuracy or veracity of supplied material.




© Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd | All Rights Reserved