Editor's Choice


Loop signature: Tuning part 4 processes

January 2025 Editor's Choice Fieldbus & Industrial Networking

In the previous two Loop Signature articles, several SWAG methods of tuning self-regulating processes were given. A very simple first-order lag deadtime process was tuned by those methods, and also by a couple of other methods including the Protuner, and the various responses to setpoint changes were shown. It was concluded that the reason that the SWAG tunings were all so different was because they were SWAG, and no such approximate method could ever give a really scientifically valid tune like the Protuner did.

Unfortunately, many plants have not invested in proper loop analytical and tuning equipment like the Protuner, and it is often extremely difficult to persuade management to commit to optimisation, as this means investment in time, people and equipment, all of which cost money. As mentioned in many of my articles in the Case History series, plants that have spent millions on a control system are often not prepared to invest a relatively small amount more to get their systems working properly, and in fact, in most cases have little idea how badly their investment in control is performing.

As a result, about 90% of all tuning performed work is done by WAG (wild ass guess) or ‘playing with the knobs’. Another 8% of people try SWAG methods, and the last 2% use truly scientific methods like the Protuner. The purpose of this particular article is to try and give those unfortunate enough to have to use WAG or SWAG tuning a bit of an idea of how to go about it and, even more importantly, some understanding of a couple of basic principles.

Unfortunately the methods discussed here will only work with really simple dynamics like a first-order lag deadtime self-regulating process. I cannot offer any advice on how to tune processes with a more complex dynamic without using the right equipment.

It is firstly necessary to know a little about the theory of tuning to understand how closed-loop control works. When you put a controller into automatic, you are actually performing a multiplication. Mathematically, the process and controller transfer functions are multiplied together. The best tuning, known as pole cancellation tuning, results in a combined transfer function, which is a perfect integrator.

C(s) x P(s) = Ke-DTs/s

This, out of interest, is exactly the same transfer function as an open-loop level process.

Pole cancellation tuning has major advantages, one of which is that it gives the lowest controller gain with the fastest integral, thus minimising valve wear and allowing fastest response to load changes. It was shown in Loop Signature 23 how a frequency plot was obtained by dynamic frequency testing. This involves applying a sine wave generator onto the process input or valve, and measuring the dynamic gain and phase shift at increasing frequencies until the PV lags the PD by 180°. The results can then be plotted on a frequency response graph, one of the most popular being the Bode plot, which was also shown in Loop Signature 23.


Figure 1.

The Bode Gain plot of our simple first-order lag, self-regulating process is a graph starting off horizontally, and then dropping off to end at the point where the phase lag reaches -180°. An important point is that the slope of the gain plot at this point is –20d.b./decade (refer to Figure 1).

The Bode gain plot of a perfect integrator is shown in Figure 2. The gain plot is a perfectly straight line sloping downwards at exactly –20d.b./decade. This is the shape to which we must convert our simple first-order lag, self-regulating process, open-loop plot when it is multiplied by the controller’s transfer function. Now, in the controller we have only three terms to help achieve this. These are the P, the I and the D terms. Figure 3 shows the individual effect of each of these terms on the plot.

The P term has no effect on the shape of the plot. However, it does affect its position in relation to the Y axis (dynamic gain). The I term affects the lower frequencies section of the plot most. It tends to lift up the left-hand side. The D term has more effect on the higher frequencies section of the plot. It tends to lift up the right-hand side.

Now, the open-loop plot of our process already ends off at the right slope, so we can immediately see that we should never use the D term on such a process, as it will ‘mess up’ our pole cancellation. Therefore we are left to control this process with just the P and the I terms. As the P does nothing to the shape, it becomes obvious that the I term must do the work of straightening first, and then the P term will be used to set the response we require for the control.


Figure 2.

A very interesting thing should be noted. If you refer to the last Loop Signature 25, where we tuned a simple process like this, you will see that the model we used had a time constant of 30 seconds. Then, in the tuning table you will see that the lambda tune gave an I value of 30,8 seconds/repeat, and both the IMC and Protuner gave an I value of 30,0 seconds/repeat.

It can be mathematically proved that if you set the I term equal to the time constant of a simple first-order self-regulating process, you cancel out the poles and get the perfectly straight line integrator closed-loop Bode plot we desire. This proof will be shown in a much later article, where the subject of process dynamics will be covered in detail.

Thus, the most important point of this article is that as far as self-regulating processes are concerned, once you get the combined plot straightened out as described, then you never again need to play with the I term, and in fact, also the D term if you did have to use it on more complex process dynamics.


Figure 3.

Therefore, if I was unfortunate enough to have to ever tune a simple self-regulating process of this kind without a proper tuning package, I would use the following SWAG method:

• After ensuring that all the problems like valve hysteresis and non-linearity were sorted out, I would first do an open-loop step test on the process to allow me to determine the basic dynamics graphically, in particular the time constant (TC) and the dead-time (DT). All of these things were detailed in previous Loop Signature articles.

• If the DT<TC I would set the I term equal to the TC.

• If the DT>TC I would set the I term equal to the TC + Total loop DT/4. Total loop deadtime is the sum of the process deadtime and the controller scan rate.

• I would adjust P by trial and error to give me the response I may desire for that particular process. At any stage in the future, if I was not happy with that response, all I would have to do is play with the P term again. Provided the process dynamics had not changed, I would never again need to adjust the I.

This is very different from the way most people try to tune these types of processes with WAG. They generally always play with P first, and then try and adjust I. It’s much harder to do it that way.



About Michael Brown

Michael Brown is a specialist in control loop optimisation, with many years of experience in process control instrumentation. His main activities are consulting and teaching practical control loop analysis and optimisation. He now presents courses and performs optimisation over the internet. His work has taken him to plants all over South Africa and also to other countries. He can be contacted at: Michael Brown Control Engineering CC, +27 82 440 7790, [email protected], www.controlloop.co.za


Credit(s)



Share this article:
Share via emailShare via LinkedInPrint this page

Further reading:

Swiss watchmaking meets hypercar power
Horne Technologies Editor's Choice
The display of Bugatti’s upcoming luxury model, Tourbillon will be something truly special. Instead of a digital version, the driver will see a genuine Swiss timepiece behind the steering wheel.

Read more...
Reinventing the wheel
Editor's Choice
Once a curiosity in the early automotive age, in-wheel motors are now re-emerging with real promise. From electric cars to commercial vehicles and even aircraft, they are on the verge of transforming transportation engineering.

Read more...
Creating new magnets for electric motors
Editor's Choice
Innomotics, a global specialist in electric motors and large drive systems, is coordinating a consortium for a research project on ‘Integrated Product and Process Innovation for Electric Drives’.

Read more...
Sustainability is transforming fluid power
Editor's Choice Motion Control & Drives
Sustainability is reshaping the future of fluid power. With the growing demand for cleaner, more efficient technologies and tightening global regulations, fluid power systems are being re-engineered for higher efficiency, lower emissions and reduced material usage.

Read more...
The power of water
Editor's Choice Electrical Power & Protection
The Alpenglow Hy4 is the world’s first water-based hydrogen combustion engine, offering a convincing alternative to traditional battery-electric vehicles and established hydrogen fuel cell designs.

Read more...
Optimising purification for green hydrogen production
Parker Hannifin - Sales Company South Africa Editor's Choice Electrical Power & Protection
Parker Hannifin delivers advanced purification and thermal management components that enhance green hydrogen production.

Read more...
A new chapter in geothermal engineering
Editor's Choice Electrical Power & Protection
The town of Geretsried in southern Germany has become a focal point in the global shift toward renewable energy. While the world’s attention often turns to wind turbines and solar panels, a quieter but no less powerful force is at work deep beneath the surface, geothermal energy.

Read more...
Harnessing the ocean with wave energy
Editor's Choice Electrical Power & Protection
Wave energy is emerging as one of the most promising yet underutilised renewable sources. Tapping into the rhythmic, predictable power of ocean waves, this technology offers a clean, reliable alternative to fossil fuels and a valuable complement to wind and solar energy.

Read more...
Leading the way to the all-electric mine
ABB South Africa Editor's Choice IT in Manufacturing
Decarbonising the mining sector requires more than just new technology. ABB eMine provides a strong portfolio of electrification and automation solutions, consulting, partnerships and technology applications to support mining operations to reduce emissions and achieve operational cost savings and superior efficiency.

Read more...
Speeding up warehouse automation
Rockwell Automation Editor's Choice Motion Control & Drives
Bastian Solutions designs and delivers world-class material handling systems. The company was engaged by a high-end global fashion brand to implement a new warehouse system. Bastian used Rockwell Automation Emulate3D digital twin software to test the system before it was installed and went live.

Read more...









While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein, the publisher and its agents cannot be held responsible for any errors contained, or any loss incurred as a result. Articles published do not necessarily reflect the views of the publishers. The editor reserves the right to alter or cut copy. Articles submitted are deemed to have been cleared for publication. Advertisements and company contact details are published as provided by the advertiser. Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd cannot be held responsible for the accuracy or veracity of supplied material.




© Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd | All Rights Reserved