classic | mobile


SA Instrumentation & Control Buyers' Guide

Technews Industry Guide - IIoT 2018

Technews Industry Guide - Maintenance, Reliability & Asset Optimisation


Case History 164: More on valves that do not control properly.
January 2019, Motion Control & Drives

I often publish articles showing valve problems. One of the reasons is that I do not think many people understand that valves are generally responsible for 75-80% of all control loop problems. When it comes to relatively fast control loops, such as flow, valve problems can often be ‘got around’ as feedback control is so powerful, and provided the controller is well tuned, it often manages to overcome the valve problems.

Consider this example

A case in point was a splitter reflux flow control loop in a refinery, which had a really bad valve. The operators were battling to control it and had the loop in manual, but even then they found it extremely difficult to get the flow to reach stability at the correct value.

Figure 1 shows the open loop test. It is interesting because it shows so many problems with the valve:

• The valve overshoots hugely on closing and opening steps.

• It is terribly oversized, probably by as much as eight times, which magnifies by eight all the problems as seen on the PV.

• The positioner/valve combination is almost unstable and at times does go into a cycle.

• The valve sticks badly.

• The valve behaves differently on different steps, which means it is not repeatable.

Figure 1.
Figure 1.

When one encounters a control loop with a valve like this, you should know that it is not possible to get proper control, so it is essential that the valve be fixed or replaced as soon as possible. However, it is sometimes possible to get a measure of control in the setpoint region by deliberately tuning the controller with fast unstable parameters in order to make it cycle around setpoint. This can sometimes help keep the plant working until the valve can be fixed, which was done here and the resultant limited control cycle can be seen in Figure 2 – certainly not nice, but often better than no control at all.

Figure 2.
Figure 2.

This solution should be used with caution, as cycling of this nature can sometimes cause problems with other interactive loops. However, if the flow loop is a cascade secondary to a slower loop, such as level or temperature, it will ensure that the average flow going into the process is correct, since the cycle is relatively fast.

Stick-slip cycles

The second example deals with a valve that exhibited a ‘stick-slip’ cycle.

Stick-slip cycles are one of the most misunderstood phenomena that occur on fast self-regulating processes such as flow loops, and are generally caused by valve or valve/positioner combination problems. On observing a stick-slip cycle, at least 95% of plant personnel are positive that it is a tuning problem and demand that the controller be retuned.

In this case, the tuning was pretty good and it took an open loop step test to analyse the problem with the valve – shown in Figure 3. On initial inspection it seems as if the valve is working perfectly, as it appears to follow step changes on the controller output very well. Deeper inspection shows that the valve is sticking quite badly though as it takes quite a few seconds to respond to the controller’s output steps. In particular, after one reversal in direction it took about seven seconds before it moved. This is far too long for a flow loop, which generally has deadtime of one, or at the most, two seconds. It is clear that the valve is sticking badly, and the positioner is doing a fantastic job of overcoming this and getting the valve smoothly to the correct position without overshoot.

Figure 3.
Figure 3.

Flow loops fall into the simplest class of process dynamics as they effectively can be defined as a self-regulating process with a single first order lag and deadtime. The correct pole cancellation to eliminate the process lag is to set the controller’s integral term equal to the time constant of the lag. Once that has been done, one merely has to adjust the controller’s proportional gain to get the control response desired for the particular loop.

Typically, flow loops have lags of around one to two seconds, and similar deadtimes. Therefore, the controller typically needs to be tuned with an integral setting of 1-2 sec/repeat, which is relatively fast. So, if the valve sticks as in this case, then the integral term starts what is known as ‘winding up’, which means it sees a constant error and starts ramping up (or down) the controller output to try and get the valve to move. The result is an excess movement in the controller’s output in the form of a constant ramp. At the point where the valve moves, the output of the controller immediately starts heading in the opposite direction. The positioner sees that the controller’s output is asking for a certain valve position, and moves the valve to that position, but unfortunately that position takes the PV to the other side of setpoint as the controller’s output has moved too far.

The net result is a typical waveform with the controller’s output forming a saw-tooth, and the PV moving in close to a square wave pattern. These waveforms can be clearly seen in Figure 4.

Figure 4.
Figure 4.

Obviously one solution would be to slow down the integral. However, in real life it ends up in a term that is so slow that decent control response cannot be obtained. Although many people think that flow loops do not need to be controlled quickly, it must be noted that many of them are cascade secondaries, which are there to remove valve problems from the slower primary loop i.e. the secondary loop really needs to be as fast as possible. In cases like this, if the valve cannot be sorted out quickly, it is better to leave it with a stick-slip cycle as in many cases these are not actually a problem, since they are relatively slow and small and will not seriously affect the valve’s life, or cause process problems.

In cases where they can cause effects, like interaction, particularly when the valve is oversized, a good solution is to put a small band around setpoint, about the size of the amplitude of the stick-slip cycle, and slow the integral down in that band. This is an excellent solution where the flow loop is a cascade secondary.

As mentioned above, many people think the stick-slip cycle is a tuning problem and so detune the controller until the cycle stops. As discussed in a previous article, I think of a loop in manual as the ultimate slow tune. In general therefore, if you slow a loop down far enough it will stop cycling. I refer to this as ‘being tuned into manual’.

Michael Brown is a specialist in control loop optimisation with many years of experience in process control instrumentation. His main activities are consulting, and teaching practical control loop analysis and optimisation. He gives training courses which can be held in clients’ plants, where students can have the added benefit of practising on live loops. His work takes him to plants all over South Africa and also to other countries. He can be contacted at Michael Brown Control Engineering cc, +27 82 440 7790,,

Supplied By: Michael Brown Control Engineering
Tel: +27 82 440 7790
Fax: 086 671 9320
Share via email     Share via LinkedIn   Print this page

Further reading:

  • Global partnerships for automotive support
    January 2019, Parker Hannifin Sales Company South, Motion Control & Drives
    Parker Hannifin is a global leader in motion control components and system solutions serving industrial, mobile and automotive markets. Specialising in hydraulics, pneumatics, electromechanics, fluid ...
  • Matching linear measurement performance to application needs
    January 2019, Parker Hannifin Sales Company South, Motion Control & Drives
    Almost all modern automated machines and systems require precise, reliable and cost-effective linear measurement. And although this need increases in line with demands for greater efficiency, speed and ...
  • Case History 163: Control limitations on mineral processing plants
    November 2018, Michael Brown Control Engineering, Motion Control & Drives
    I was recently asked to conduct a control loop audit on a mineral extraction processing plant which was fairly old and had been acquired by new owners. A new and very modern control system had been installed ...
  • PC-based control ­ increases throughput in additive ­manufacturing
    November 2018, Beckhoff Automation, Motion Control & Drives
    Automated post-print processing puts the finishing touches on 3D printed parts.
  • SEW supplies industrial gear units for West African mine
    November 2018, SEW-Eurodrive , Motion Control & Drives
    Having an in-house projects department to focus on the specific requirements of project houses, OEMs and other tender-related project activity is starting to bear fruit for drive and automation specialist ...
  • Motion analyser software shortens design time
    November 2018, Rockwell Automation, Motion Control & Drives
    Rockwell Automation has released an updated version of the Allen-Bradley Motion Analyser software tool, which offers an optimised user experience with intuitive navigation and in-workflow product selection. ...
  • Edge applications for machine tools
    November 2018, Siemens Digital Factory & Process Indust. & Drives, Motion Control & Drives
    As part of Siemens Industrial Edge, the company is launching applications for Sinumerik Edge, the machine-level platform specially designed for the machine tool industry, at AMB 2018 in Stuttgart. This ...
  • Nord drives for wash-down ­applications
    November 2018, Bearing Man Group t/a BMG, Motion Control & Drives
    BMG’s range of Nord aluminium drives is available with the nsd tupH (sealed surface conversion system) anti-corrosion treatment, which has been developed for improved process reliability in extreme environmental ...
  • Eaton motor control for easy installation
    November 2018, Magnet , Motion Control & Drives
    Magnet’s portfolio of space saving Eaton motor control and protection devices offer motor starting and protection solutions in diverse industries, including mining, oil and gas, pulp and paper, the automotive ...
  • Linear modules with one-point lubrication simplify assembly
    November 2018, Tectra Automation, Motion Control & Drives
    The third generation of MKK and MKR linear modules from Tectra Automation expands the range of equipment options for the company’s linear module series. In the corrosion resistant versions, hard chrome ...
  • How drives help in papermaking
    October 2018, Nidec, Motion Control & Drives
    Papermaking machinery, from tissue winders through to suction rolls, embossers, print units and conveyors, must utilise the latest drive technologies to meet modern paper mill production schedules and ...
  • SKF offers new Lincoln lubrication pinion
    October 2018, SKF South Africa, Motion Control & Drives
    SKF has announced the introduction of its Lincoln lubrication pinion LP2 for open gear wheels and gear racks. Complementing SKF’s existing lubrication pinion line, the reliable LP2 features a modular ...

Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd
1st Floor, Stabilitas House
265 Kent Ave, Randburg, 2194
South Africa
Publications by Technews
Dataweek Electronics & Communications Technology
Electronic Buyers Guide (EBG)

Hi-Tech Security Solutions
Hi-Tech Security Business Directory

Motion Control in Southern Africa
Motion Control Buyers’ Guide (MCBG)

South African Instrumentation & Control
South African Instrumentation & Control Buyers’ Guide (IBG)
Terms & conditions of use, including privacy policy
PAIA Manual


    classic | mobile

Copyright © Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd. All rights reserved.