Editor's Choice


Loop signature 29: Averaging or surge level control

July 2025 Editor's Choice Flow Measurement & Control

In several previous articles in this series and in the Case History series, numerous examples of level control have been discussed, including methods for tuning level loops. Throughout these discussions, the focus has been on achieving a relatively quick tuning response, often referred to as “tight control.”

An example of a level loop tuned this way and responding to a step change in setpoint is shown in Figure 1. Because of the low process gains inherent in level processes, one generally needs relatively high controller gains in order to get a fast response. In the test shown in Figure 1, the controller had a gain of 10. Therefore, when making a step change in setpoint, the output of the controller will immediately give a big step, and in many cases will immediately fully open or close depending on the situation.

There are many processes in various plants where it is very undesirable for the load to suddenly change quickly. An example taken from the paper industry is shown in Figure 2. A blending tank is shown where the various pulp stocks used in the recipe for a particular type of paper are mixed. The blended mixture is pumped out of the tank to the next stage in the paper-making process. Downstream from the pump, there is a transmitter measuring the consistency of the pulp. This transmitter feeds a controller that controls the consistency of the pulp by adjusting a water dilution flow into the pipe before the pump. Good consistency control is important in paper manufacture. To help achieve this, it is desirable that the flow of pulp out of the blending tank be held as constant as possible. If the flow were to jump around, it would be very hard for the consistency control to keep up. A valve downstream from the pump is used to control the level in the blending tank. Now, if its controller was tuned with a high gain like around 10, as in the example shown in Figure 1, the chances are high that the valve would move around quite a bit and the consistency would then probably suffer accordingly. Now, in the case of a blending tank, it is not actually important to keep it controlled at a particular point. It will not affect things if it moves around. It is far more important to keep the flow out of the tank constant, rather than control the level. So why do they use a level controller? Why not put a flow controller in instead? There are two reasons. Firstly, the blending tank must not be allowed to overflow, and secondly, it must not be allowed to run empty, which would result in pump cavitation. To achieve this and allow some safety factors, we could then specify the control requirements as:

• At a 90% level, the valve must be fully open.

• At a 10% level, the valve must be fully closed.

• In between these levels, the valve should move as little as possible.

The first two requirements are shown graphically in Figure 3.

To try and achieve all three requirements, many of the manufacturers have come up with a variety of relatively fancy controllers. Some of them, like notch gain controllers or error squared on gain controllers, are standard blocks in many of the DCSs. However, they usually give little information on their use, and I have found very few people who know what they are for or how to use them. I am typically asked how one tunes such a controller.

In my opinion, one should generally not use a controller at all for this application. The one exception may be in cases where an integral is needed to slowly bring the level back to a particular level. I believe controllers used in this application create a great deal of confusion amongst plant operating personnel.

The reason for this is that you do not actually want to control at a particular setpoint. So, if you do set the controller up properly, the chances are that the process will never be at setpoint, and this worries most operators. They have been brought up to believe that a controller is only working correctly if the process is on the setpoint.

So what happens in most plants I have been in is that they complain to the Instrumentation and Control department, and an instrument technician or mechanician goes out and retunes the controller to operate quickly, thus destroying the desired control strategy. As mentioned in previous articles, I have found that the average instrument technician and mechanician do not understand the process and the control requirements.

What I would suggest is that the controller be dispensed with entirely, and that the operator be provided with a level indicator only. If the operator must be able to control the level valve manually if necessary, then an auto/manual hand station can also be provided.

To achieve the control requirements, one connects the valve to the transmitter via a curve-shaping block (like a polynomial or a look-up table). The simplest method of programming the block is by joining the two endpoints with a straight line. This is shown in Figure 4. Basically, it works just like a ball valve that operates between 10% and 90% of the tank level. Thus, if the level rises, the valve starts opening until it is fully open at 90%, and vice versa for a falling level.

This is still not good enough in some applications where the valve movement may still be too much if large load changes occur. One method of overcoming this is to use a non-linear relationship in the shaping block instead of a straight line. One simple method is to use a graph like the one shown in Figure 5. This type of shape is sometimes referred to as ‘notch gain’ control. With this method, the valve will move very little over most of the tank level, but will move faster when the level starts reaching the extremities.

Another method (which is also very effective) is to use what is sometimes referred to as an ‘error cubed’ shaped graph, which is illustrated in Figure 6. This is similar to the notch gain, but has a much smoother transition from slow to fast. To calculate the graph, one takes the cube of the deviation from 50% level.



About Michael Brown

Michael Brown is a retired specialist in control loop optimisation, with over 50 years of experience in process control instrumentation. His main activities were consulting and teaching practical control loop analysis and optimisation. He presented courses and optimised controls in numerous plants in many countries around the world. Michael is continuing to write articles based on the work he has done, and his courses are still available for purchase in .PDF format. He is still handling the sales of the Protuner Loop Optimisation software. He is happy to answer questions people may have on loop problems.

Contact details: Michael Brown Control Engineering CC, +27 82 440 7790, [email protected], www.controlloop.co.za




Share this article:
Share via emailShare via LinkedInPrint this page

Further reading:

Swiss watchmaking meets hypercar power
Horne Technologies Editor's Choice
The display of Bugatti’s upcoming luxury model, Tourbillon will be something truly special. Instead of a digital version, the driver will see a genuine Swiss timepiece behind the steering wheel.

Read more...
Reinventing the wheel
Editor's Choice
Once a curiosity in the early automotive age, in-wheel motors are now re-emerging with real promise. From electric cars to commercial vehicles and even aircraft, they are on the verge of transforming transportation engineering.

Read more...
Creating new magnets for electric motors
Editor's Choice
Innomotics, a global specialist in electric motors and large drive systems, is coordinating a consortium for a research project on ‘Integrated Product and Process Innovation for Electric Drives’.

Read more...
Sustainability is transforming fluid power
Editor's Choice Motion Control & Drives
Sustainability is reshaping the future of fluid power. With the growing demand for cleaner, more efficient technologies and tightening global regulations, fluid power systems are being re-engineered for higher efficiency, lower emissions and reduced material usage.

Read more...
The power of water
Editor's Choice Electrical Power & Protection
The Alpenglow Hy4 is the world’s first water-based hydrogen combustion engine, offering a convincing alternative to traditional battery-electric vehicles and established hydrogen fuel cell designs.

Read more...
Optimising purification for green hydrogen production
Parker Hannifin - Sales Company South Africa Editor's Choice Electrical Power & Protection
Parker Hannifin delivers advanced purification and thermal management components that enhance green hydrogen production.

Read more...
A new chapter in geothermal engineering
Editor's Choice Electrical Power & Protection
The town of Geretsried in southern Germany has become a focal point in the global shift toward renewable energy. While the world’s attention often turns to wind turbines and solar panels, a quieter but no less powerful force is at work deep beneath the surface, geothermal energy.

Read more...
Harnessing the ocean with wave energy
Editor's Choice Electrical Power & Protection
Wave energy is emerging as one of the most promising yet underutilised renewable sources. Tapping into the rhythmic, predictable power of ocean waves, this technology offers a clean, reliable alternative to fossil fuels and a valuable complement to wind and solar energy.

Read more...
Leading the way to the all-electric mine
ABB South Africa Editor's Choice IT in Manufacturing
Decarbonising the mining sector requires more than just new technology. ABB eMine provides a strong portfolio of electrification and automation solutions, consulting, partnerships and technology applications to support mining operations to reduce emissions and achieve operational cost savings and superior efficiency.

Read more...
Speeding up warehouse automation
Rockwell Automation Editor's Choice Motion Control & Drives
Bastian Solutions designs and delivers world-class material handling systems. The company was engaged by a high-end global fashion brand to implement a new warehouse system. Bastian used Rockwell Automation Emulate3D digital twin software to test the system before it was installed and went live.

Read more...









While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein, the publisher and its agents cannot be held responsible for any errors contained, or any loss incurred as a result. Articles published do not necessarily reflect the views of the publishers. The editor reserves the right to alter or cut copy. Articles submitted are deemed to have been cleared for publication. Advertisements and company contact details are published as provided by the advertiser. Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd cannot be held responsible for the accuracy or veracity of supplied material.




© Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd | All Rights Reserved