Editor's Choice

Industrial control system cybersecurity - Part 5: ICS network segmentation.

October 2018 Editor's Choice IT in Manufacturing

In the last three articles on cybersecurity in ICS environments, we have covered risk assessments, asset discovery and vulnerability management, environment hardening and security monitoring. In the penultimate article, we will cover network segmentation in ICS networks.

Historically, many ICS/engineering departments were not focused on protecting the inside of their networks, only the perimeter was protected with the firewall being seen as the single line of defence against the malicious insiders, third-party vendors and the bad guys from the outside. This strategy, while effective for its day, does not hold true in the modern digital world. Today’s attacks are being facilitated by large and well-funded groups of cyber criminals looking to steal intellectual information, stop production and extort companies. Once access is gained by breaching the perimeter, these cyber criminals are able to move freely within your network. This is why it is strongly recommended to implement a network segmentation framework.

Splitting up the network

ICS network segmentation is the process of splitting up your network into different segments or sub-networks, to improve performance, but more importantly, to make it more difficult for an adversary to freely move around if they compromise a part of your network. To define this further, it is the process of grouping similar assets and then enforcing a segment between the levels both above and below.

To put this into perspective, Target Corporation, a leading USA retailer, lost 40 million credit and debit card numbers in December 2013. The first part of this compromise is that the cyber criminals stole credential information from a third party HVAC supplier. The second part is that these credentials were then used to gain access to the Target Corporation network. The third part is that once the cyber criminals gained access they targeted the POS systems, by installing malware on them. There is more to this incident (an entire article on its own), but it does highlight the need for strong effective network segmentation. If there was proper network segmentation between the POS network, the third party network and the main corporate network, it would have been much more difficult to steal the information.

Purdue Enterprise Reference Architecture

One of the most commonly used models is that of the Purdue Enterprise Reference Architecture model, more commonly known as PERA or just the Purdue model. I strongly urge all of those responsible for ICS cybersecurity to review this method. It was developed by the Industry-Purdue University Consortium for Computer Integrated Manufacturing, and has been widely adopted by major industrial control system cybersecurity frameworks such as NIST 800-82 and ISA/IEC 62443.

From a hierarchical view the model is comprised of 6 levels and 5 zones. The 6 levels are:

• Level 0: Process.

• Level 1: Basic control.

• Level 3: Operations and control.

• Level 4: Business planning and logistics.

• Level 5: Enterprise network.

And the five zones being:

• Enterprise zone.

• Demilitarised zone (DMZ).

• Manufacturing zone.

• Cell/area zone.

• Safety zone/Safety Instrumented System (SIS).

The diagram is a very basic control network depicting how the Purdue model should logically be implemented.

One aspect to take note of from the diagram is that no control system protocol should traverse the ICS network into the enterprise or business network. All too often we still find ICS traffic on the IT network(s), which not only slows down network performance by having unnecessary traffic ‘on the wire’, but also provides huge security risks as these protocols have no, or very limited, built-in security. If ICS traffic is absolutely required to traverse the ICS network through to the IT network, ensure that is it is strictly controlled.

Each ICS system is different and requires certain tweaks and changes to the customer’s specific ICS network segmentation framework. Where the Purdue model helps is that it assists in designing a base framework which you can then build on. As I’ve stated previously, there is no ‘one size fits all’ framework that is right for everyone, and there are other models that you might want to consider to suite your organisation’s needs. The Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) and Software-Defined Networking (SDN) is also changing the way we see and segment our networks.

Tommy Thompson

Tommy Thompson is a passionate cybersecurity professional with some 15 years’ experience. Starting as a firewall engineer in 2001, Thompson has assisted a variety of companies in numerous roles with their cybersecurity problems. He holds a BComm degree in Information Management from Oxford Brookes University (UK) and he is certified by PECB (Canada), as a Scada Security Professional (CSSP).

For further information contact Tommy Thompson, +27 (0)11 463 0096, tommy@nclose.com


Share this article:
Share via emailShare via LinkedInPrint this page

Further reading:

Yokogawa’s Smart Terminal Automation Solution
April 2019, Yokogawa South Africa , IT in Manufacturing
Yokogawa has accumulated more than two decades of experience in the automation of such terminals and supplied its Terminal Automation Solution to suit varying customer needs.

Listening to the Voice of the Machine
April 2019, Parker Hannifin Sales Company South , IT in Manufacturing
The value of discrete IoT.

Measurement data on the lookout for artificial intelligence
April 2019, Phoenix Contact , IT in Manufacturing
In the global race for competitive prices, it is the most efficient processes that win the race.

IoT-enabled field services improve industrial asset availability
Technews Industry Guide: Maintenance, Reliability & Asset Optimisation 2019 , IT in Manufacturing
Today, many equipment manufacturers are reclaiming the service relationship from the distribution channels with a modern field service management system and remote monitoring.

Understanding how predictive analytics tools benefit power utility management
Technews Industry Guide: Maintenance, Reliability & Asset Optimisation 2019, IS³ - Industry Software, Solutions & Support , IT in Manufacturing
This paper reviews how predictive analytics tools can be applied to both utility operations and maintenance.

Seamless acquisition and analysis of plant data
Technews Industry Guide: Maintenance, Reliability & Asset Optimisation 2019, Beckhoff Automation , IT in Manufacturing
TwinCAT Analytics supports the ability to investigate machine optimisation and facilitate predictive maintenance.

Nick Denbow’s European report: Trends in plant monitoring
March 2019 , Editor's Choice
Early last year, the interest from many large automation and sensor suppliers focused on condition monitoring, for example, using wireless communications to monitor the condition of the motors and bearings ...

Now might be the time to have a talk with your IT service provider
March 2019, Absolute Perspectives , Editor's Choice, IT in Manufacturing
The Gartner hype cycle provides a simple graphic representation of how emerging technologies are adopted in the market. The principle is quite simple: a new technology (such as augmented reality) will ...

Digital Enterprise offering with ­future technologies for Industry 4.0
February 2019, Siemens Digital Industries , IT in Manufacturing
By expanding its Digital Enterprise portfolio and integrating future technologies, Siemens is driving forward the digital transformation of the discrete and process industries.

Nick Denbow’s European report: Will UK industry pull out of the Brexit torpor?
February 2019 , Editor's Choice
Whether the UK – whoever is in charge – decides in March to remain in the EU, drop out, or make a negotiated partial exit, the last year has been disastrous for UK industrial investment in instrumentation ...