IT in Manufacturing

What is the difference between IoT and M2M?

May 2014 IT in Manufacturing

Industry discussions regarding the industrial Internet of Things (IoT) and its potential benefits have raised numerous questions regarding distinctions between the IoT and its forerunner, machine-to-machine (M2M) communications. Remote device access is a core common deliverable for both solutions, so questions concerning how to distinguish between the two are understandable.

Commonality between the two solution types largely ends there and they differ in how they achieve remote device access. For example, traditional M2M solutions typically rely on point-to-point communications using embedded hardware modules and either cellular or wireline networks. In contrast, IoT solutions rely on IP-based networks to interface device data to a cloud or middleware platform.

The M2M market’s sustained inability to realise its forecast growth potential, and the reasons for that failure, provides telling indicators of the true differences between the IoT vs. M2M. While M2M solutions offer remote access to machine data, these data are traditionally targeted at point solutions in service management applications. Rarely, if ever, are the data integrated with enterprise applications to help improve overall business performance. Integration of device and sensor data with big data, analytics, and other enterprise applications is a core concept behind the emerging Internet of Things. This integration is key to achieving numerous benefits throughout the manufacturing enterprise and, ultimately, growth in the marketplace.

Remote device access

Access to remote devices, machines, assets, and other entities provides a primary value proposition for both M2M and IoT solutions. M2M applications are typically composed of hardware modules embedded in a machine at a customer site that communicate via proprietary cellular or wireline networks to a dedicated software application, often at the supplier’s service operation. This capability allows the device/asset/machine supplier to reduce its service management costs through remote diagnostics, remote troubleshooting, remote updates, and other remote capabilities that reduce the need to deploy field service personnel.

In industrial IoT solutions, the ‘what, how and why’ of remote device access involves much broader brushstrokes. The IoT accommodates not only the same devices/assets/machines as M2M applications, but also low-power and passive sensors as well as inexpensive devices that may not be able to justify a dedicated M2M hardware module. IoT devices communicate via standards-based IP networks and their data are incorporated into enterprise applications to enable not only improved service, but also operational improvement and new business models such as product-as-a-service.

The ability for applications throughout the enterprise to access device data to enable performance improvements, business innovation, or other possibilities, clearly distinguishes the potential of IoT versus M2M. This IoT-based data delivery is usually to a cloud, enabling access by any sanctioned enterprise application. In contrast, M2M typically employs direct point-to-point communication. The cloud-based architecture also makes IoT inherently more scalable, eliminating the need for incremental hard-wired connections and SIM card installations. This is one reason why M2M is often referred to as ‘plumbing,’ while the IoT is seen as a universal enabler.

Integrated IoT solutions enable higher-order benefits

Enterprise integration, higher-order benefits potential, and the ability to accommodate more and a wider variety of devices underscore why the IoT market bears much greater potential than traditional M2M. Customers of M2M and IoT applications alike aim to reduce unplanned downtime and both types of solutions offer the potential to improve service management, a higher order benefit. The IoT excels here as well, providing the ability to assess these issues from a system level as well as at the device or machine level and applying analytics and processing big data to tweak out incremental benefits.

Reliance on the software versus hardware aspects of the architecture makes IoT solutions more accessible to a broader variety of both internal and external customers. Universal visualisation capabilities allow data to be presented anywhere, including on mobile devices to any sanctioned users. The combination of these attributes further raises the visibility of IoT solutions and generates attention at the C-level, rather than just at the departmental level.

Differences in supplier landscape

Suppliers of M2M and IoT applications typically have different competencies. This directly affects users’ ability to generate the desired benefits from their remote device access solutions.

M2M supplier competencies tend to focus on the ‘plumbing’ aspects mentioned earlier, particularly embedded hardware and cellular telecommunications networks. Many are starting to add cloud capability through internal development, acquisition, or partnering. But for most M2M suppliers, this represents new terrain. IoT solution suppliers, on the other hand, tend to emphasise software capabilities and particularly enterprise integration. These are important distinctions.

Specify the right solution

The terms M2M and IoT have become synonymous in many quarters, but it is important to make sure you specify a solution that meets your current and anticipated needs. This involves recognising upfront whether you seek a point solution for simple remote machine access, like in a service management application, or look to drive incremental business benefits across the enterprise through use of analytics, big data, and other software-oriented performance improvement tools. Enterprise integration capabilities, scalability, software vs. hardware emphasis, and use of standard vs. proprietary device connections are key criteria that impact whether you have an IoT or M2M solution.

ARC recently launched a dedicated Industrial Internet of Things (IoT) Advisory Service ( designed to help manufacturers and other industrial organisations make sense of, evaluate, plan for, and potentially implement emerging IoT technology and solutions.

For more information contact Paul Miller, ARC Advisory Group, +1 781 471 1126,,

Share this article:
Share via emailShare via LinkedInPrint this page

Further reading:

Mitigate industrial network vulnerabilities
July 2021, RJ Connect , IT in Manufacturing
It must not be forgotten that ignoring common system vulnerabilities in today’s world could put your entire network at risk.

Digital transformation in mining
July 2021 , IT in Manufacturing
Rapid advances in technology have disrupted industries and businesses around the world, which are now being forced to accept this new reality rather quickly because the new technologies have tremendous potential to deliver value for those who adopt them.

Digital twins require accurate and reliable data to be effective
July 2021 , IT in Manufacturing
At the 25th ARC Industry Forum, hosted virtually, many industry experts gave their perspectives on accelerating digital transformation in the post-Covid world.

Frequency analysis without programming requirements
July 2021, Beckhoff Automation , IT in Manufacturing
Beckhoff expands TwinCAT Analytics with easy-to-configure condition monitoring functions.

Siemens adds AI to Simcenter
July 2021, Siemens Digital Industries , IT in Manufacturing
Siemens Digital Industries Software has announced the latest release of Simcenter Studio software, a web application dedicated to discovering better system architectures, faster. Simcenter Studio offers ...

ABB technology can help make SA steel industry competitive
June 2021, ABB South Africa , IT in Manufacturing
South Africa’s steel industry needs to invest in technology like automation and data analytics if it is to improve its productivity to the point where it is globally competitive.

Siemens expands CFD simulations
June 2021, Siemens Digital Industries , IT in Manufacturing
Siemens’ Simcenter portfolio expands capabilities for frontloading computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation and increased productivity.

Digital twin for refinery production
June 2021, Yokogawa South Africa , IT in Manufacturing
Within Repsol’s Industrial Business, the development of a refinery digital twin leads the digitalisation program. The digital twin maximises production while optimising energy consumption.

Building secure networks
June 2021, RJ Connect , IT in Manufacturing
This article explores how to build resilient industrial networks and deploy cybersecurity defences in order to sustain continuous industrial operations.

Improving the state of OT cybersecurity by sharing experiences
June 2021 , IT in Manufacturing
It is essential that we view improvements in cybersecurity as requiring improvements in multiple areas, including people and skills development, governance and process development and improved technology.